Rand report focuses on RFID in health

Tags: European Commission Netherlands RFID UK

15 Jul 2009

A major new research report commissioned by the European Commission has detailed the opportunities for, and barriers to, the deployment of auto-tracking technology in European healthcare systems.

The report, which focuses on Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), says that despite being a useful tool in logistics and operational management it is so far “less successful in patient care and quality of care improvement.”

The report states: “Compared to logistics, patient care delivery applications face greater implementation problems. Interference of RFID and other wireless equipment with electronic equipment remains the single biggest obstacle to RFID roll-out in healthcare.”

The study titled: “Requirements and options for Radio Frequency Identification application in healthcare,” was conducted by RAND Europe, the Cambridge-based policy research organisation.

The report includes an assessment of expert views from the healthcare industry and seven case studies from healthcare organisations in Italy, the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, America and the UK in order to establish the cost benefits of existing RFID applications.

It stresses that RFID is not unique in many of its functionalities and that other more consolidated auto tracking technologies, such as bar coding and DataMatrix [2-D bar coding], provide similar capabilities, often for a lesser cost.

“In several contexts, RFID is seen as complementary to these technologies, increasingly in combination with WiFi infrastructures,” says the report.

Of the seven case studies, the hospital in the Netherlands failed to complete the pilot, which entailed running three pilots simultaneously. A further two, in Geneva and Germany, decided to opt for DataMatrix solutions instead of RFID.

The document highlights that physical constraints, such as tag size, lack of “off-the-shelf RFID systems” and poor battery capacity are present further obstacles to the wider roll-out of RFID.

It also states that “the cost-benefit ratio of RFID applications can be either unclear or even negative in some healthcare settings”.

In addition, despite RFID being promoted to improve patient safety, “the experience across most cases suggests that hospitals are not ready to carry the costs and are not yet convinced of the benefits.”

Despite this, the report suggests that there is potential room for realising economic benefits and improving the delivery of care when RFID applications are successfully adopted in a healthcare setting.

However, the document also clearly stresses that RFID offers benefits in providing a better operational overview of medical assets, tracking patients and improving the automatic collection of data and its transfer to back office mechanisms.

The report concludes that the benefits of RFID depend largely on organisational, financial and technical considerations and that, in particular, strong commitment of senior management and direct engagement of all relevant interests are essential.

Link

Study on the requirements and options for Radio Frequency Identification application in healthcare

Sarah Bruce

Wireless healthcare depends on security (14 Jul 2009)
EU issues privacy guidance for RFID (15 May 2009)

Reader's Comments

RFID here to stay

16 Jul 09 09:07

Aren't these just standard teething problems of any new technology? RFID has great potential to improve patient care - through blood tracking, helping tackle hospital acquired infections, and detecting patient falls - but its much easier to start tracking euqipment and big ticket items.

Proven RFID System For Mecial Records

16 Jul 09 15:07

One area of healthcare where RFID has been PROVEN to provide an effective solution is the management of medical records.

An off-the-shelf "plug & play" system from 3M based on passive RFID tags, has been utilised to dramatically reduce the number of missing case notes and the time taken to locate files. In addition to this, the system allows compliance with NHS code of practice which states there must be an audit trail of all movements of medical records.

Cash releasing efficiency savings can be achieved to give full return on investment in a short period, whilst in addition affording non cash savings associated with stress, patient experience, risk elimination, reputation and insurance ratings.

More information on the system can be seen in E-Health Insider's Special Report on Document Management:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/features/docman2009/

And at:

www.3m.co.uk/patientrecordstracking

(Along with more information on the system and user testimonials)

Usefulness...

16 Jul 09 16:07

RFID isn't really a new technology, is it? It's getting pretty mature. At least, it's well over the hype phase. In which case we ought to be able to work out what it's good at and what it's not so good at. Or perhaps what it's useful for and what it's not so useful for. Or even when its worth the extra cost and when it's not. RFID seems good at and useful for stuff keeping track of stuff that moves around and that you don't want to stop to scan. This includes marathon runners and hospital (paper) documents. It might be good at keeping track of other things, but it might or might not always be worth the cost. This includes most (but not all) goods in supermarkets and many (but not all) goods in the healthcare supply chain. Meantime, it's probably not so good at keeping track of stuff that you might actually want to stop and scan - and this might include blood at the bedside. On other thing: how does an RFID tag spot someone falling over?